ext_3375: Banded Tussock (0)
Nile ([identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] karen2205 2007-07-26 03:24 pm (UTC)


The reason bottled-water manufacturers don't advertise the product as suitable for babies is that tap-water is often far cleaner.

You are quite correct to identify filtration as assential: soil particles and 'dirt' (any visible organic matter) harbour bacteria and may shield them from boiling or chemical sterilisation. The public water supply is treated by filtration - usually sand filter beds - and by 'flocculation', the addition of chemicals that cause minerals to precipitate out of solution and small suspended particles (including bacteria) to clump and settle out. Some brands of water-purification tablets do this, too - its quite a party trick, turning ditchwater sparkling clear - and flocculation alone is often sufficient to render water safe to drink without additional chemical treatment. Nevertheless, both you and the local water authority will use a chemical agent, too - a belt-and-braces approach that leaves the smell of chlorine and a near-total reassurance that treated water is now safe to drink.

Be that as it may, floodwater is best left well alone: it isn't just soil bacteria and sewage, it's chemical pollutants you need to worry about. Runoff from roads, for example, contains oil and petrol residues - mildly carcinigenic, severely irritant to your gut. Even charcoal filtration isn't reliable against urban pollutants, and there's no hope of removing industrial spillage.

So collect rainwater instead - it still needs treating (was the container clean?) but it's a better bet than floodwater.







Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org