![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Flood water
Am I right in thinking that flood water could be drunk if it was filtered and then purified with water purifying tablets/solution?
I'm shocked that bottled water isn't suitable for babies. You'd have thought at least one manufacturer of bottled water would bottle water with sufficiently low trace elements that it could be used for babies.
I'm not surprised at people hoarding water/taking more than their 'fair' share. Water is such a essential resource that people are going to fight about it if they've not got enough. Human nature, the survival instinct and all that. The time to be stockpiling water is at some point when there is no imminent danger of its loss.
I'm shocked that bottled water isn't suitable for babies. You'd have thought at least one manufacturer of bottled water would bottle water with sufficiently low trace elements that it could be used for babies.
I'm not surprised at people hoarding water/taking more than their 'fair' share. Water is such a essential resource that people are going to fight about it if they've not got enough. Human nature, the survival instinct and all that. The time to be stockpiling water is at some point when there is no imminent danger of its loss.
no subject
Some bottled waters are safe - Chiltern Hills, for instance, is basically taken from the same source as tap water in Hertfordshire (i.e. artesian wells in the chalk). And there's one bottled water produced by Coca-Cola that is just bottled tap water! But rather than issuing a long list of which bottled waters would be safe and which wouldn't, it's simpler to just say "don't use bottled water to make up baby formula". In theory if you put it through a good quality water filter such as Brita it would filter out the harmful minerals. It's one of those situations where I'm heartily glad I breasteed though.
no subject
no subject
Re: water filters
no subject
no subject
no subject
Re: water filters
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Certainly I've seen stuff grow in media after autoclaving which is something like 12-15 mins under pressure at 130 C. Which is considered sterile. But that only aims to removes bacteria not any toxins. Boiling in a kettle is nowhere near as efficient.
Since we have the option of bowsers for water, the risks are a lot lower using it from them. It's the best choice and I assume with the lowest risks, so why use anything else?
As for bottled water I did a quick pub med search and people here are just commenting on the sodium content for babies.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=ShowDetailView&TermToSearch=1662352&ordinalpos=2&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
"For babies under 4 months of age, it is better to use bottled water with a low mineral content (nitrates less than 15 mg/l). " Is quoted, so I'm guessing it's not that simple.
To sides to the coin though another paper claims drinking mineral water with higher magnesium content would lower cot deaths:
"Some data support the hypothesis that magnesium deficiency contributes to SIDS [cot death]. "
Complex area of debate it would seem so the choice of giving simple advice wins out. I'm guessing nearly every salt in that water has a paper on it effects which could be hyped and modified to prove a point.
Also I don't remember water purification kits being that cheap.
no subject
no subject
The reason bottled-water manufacturers don't advertise the product as suitable for babies is that tap-water is often far cleaner.
You are quite correct to identify filtration as assential: soil particles and 'dirt' (any visible organic matter) harbour bacteria and may shield them from boiling or chemical sterilisation. The public water supply is treated by filtration - usually sand filter beds - and by 'flocculation', the addition of chemicals that cause minerals to precipitate out of solution and small suspended particles (including bacteria) to clump and settle out. Some brands of water-purification tablets do this, too - its quite a party trick, turning ditchwater sparkling clear - and flocculation alone is often sufficient to render water safe to drink without additional chemical treatment. Nevertheless, both you and the local water authority will use a chemical agent, too - a belt-and-braces approach that leaves the smell of chlorine and a near-total reassurance that treated water is now safe to drink.
Be that as it may, floodwater is best left well alone: it isn't just soil bacteria and sewage, it's chemical pollutants you need to worry about. Runoff from roads, for example, contains oil and petrol residues - mildly carcinigenic, severely irritant to your gut. Even charcoal filtration isn't reliable against urban pollutants, and there's no hope of removing industrial spillage.
So collect rainwater instead - it still needs treating (was the container clean?) but it's a better bet than floodwater.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Though more of my point is it's complex, and the simple option is the way forward. You also have to remember the press can just pull out a paper like that and use it for hysteria. My point wasn't trying to say you can or you can't, more they're using a solution that works for them politically.
no subject
no subject
That's what 2 in 10 at best. Nearly 1 per house hold.
no subject